• 06月29日 星期六

《经济学人》双语:新加坡同性恋法律?

《经济学人》双语:新加坡同性恋法律?

原文标题:
Homosexuality in Singapore
Crime and no punishment
An anti-gay law is allowed to stay—so long as it is not enforced
新加坡的同性恋
罪无应得
一项反同性恋法律只要不被执行就可以继续存在


Singapore’s high court retains an anti-gay law
But only because it is not enforced
新加坡高等法院保留了一项反同性恋法律
但这只是因为它没有得到执行

[Paragraph 1]
IN A REGION where governments often disregard or contort their own laws, Singapore stands out for punctilious observance.

在一个各国政府经常无视或扭曲本国法律的地区,新加坡以循规蹈矩著称。


That is why a recent judgment from its high court raised eyebrows.

这就是为什么该国高级法院最近的一项判决引起了人们的关注。


On February 28th the Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge brought by three gay-rights activists against a law, dating from the colonial era, that criminalises sex between men.

2月28日,上诉法庭驳回了由三名同性恋权利活动人士发起的诉讼案件。他们对一项可追溯到殖民时代的法律(将男性之间的x行为定为犯罪)提出的质疑。


The legislation will remain on the books—yet the court has in effect told the government it can carry on pretending it does not exist.
这项立法仍将停留在书面上,但实际上,法院告诉政府,它可以继续假装它不存在。

《经济学人》双语:新加坡同性恋法律?


[Paragraph 2]
Section 377A of the Penal Code, which punishes acts of “gross indecency” between men with up to two years in jail, is a “lightning rod for polarisation”, as the justices put it.They have done their best not to get electrocuted.

根据《刑法典》第377A条:男子之间的“严重猥亵”行为面临最高2年的监禁。法官们说377A是“极化的避雷针”,他们尽了最大努力不会发生触电(处罚)。


The court sidestepped the question of the law’s constitutionality by arguing that the judges had to take into account the government’s stance.

法院回避了这项法律的合宪性问题,称法官必须考虑政府的立场。


When parliament debated 377A in 2007, Lee Hsien Loong, the prime minister, declared that it would remain but would not be “proactively enforced”.
2007年,当议会就377A进行辩论时,总理李显龙宣布保留377A,但不会“主动执行”。

[Paragraph 3]
Mr Lee argued that it was necessary to strike a balance between accepting gay men and respecting society’s “traditional” mores.

李显龙认为,有必要在接受男同性恋和尊重社会“传统”习俗之间取得平衡。


The court said that this “political compromise” took on legal weight in 2018 when the attorney-general said that it was not in the public interest to prosecute consenting men who engage in sexual acts in private.

法院表示,这一“政治妥协”在2018年具有法律效力,当时司法部长表示,起诉同意私下进行x行为的男性不符合公共利益。


The law cannot violate the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights, the court argued, if the authorities are not enforcing it.
法院认为,如果当局不执行该法律,该法律就不能侵犯原告的宪法权利。

[Paragraph 4]
“This is really a live-and-let-live approach,” says Eugene Tan, a law professor at Singapore Management University.Yet it has satisfied no one.

新加坡管理大学法学谭尤金教授说:“这真是一种和平共处的方法。”然而,这并没有让任何人满意。


Though the ruling seems a blow to gay Singaporeans, it is in fact “a partial but significant victory” for them, said one of the plaintiffs, because the court gave legal weight to the attorney-general’s position.
其中一名原告说,虽然这项裁决似乎对新加坡同性恋者是一个打击,但事实上对他们来说是“一个局部但重大的胜利”,因为法院对司法部长的立场给予了法律上的重视。


[Paragraph 5]
That will displease Singapore’s many conservatives. But gay activists are also unhappy.

这将使新加坡的许多保守派感到不快。但同性恋活动人士也不高兴。


As the court acknowledged, there is nothing to stop the government from deciding to start enforcing the law once again.

正如法院承认的那样,没有什么可以阻止政府决定再次开始执法。


Legislation should “provide clarity on how citizens conduct their lives”, says Remy Choo Zheng Xi, a lawyer for one of the plaintiffs.

一位原告的律师瑞美郑茜说,立法应该“对公民如何进行自己的生活有清晰明确的规定”。


The judgment has instead muddied the waters. Keeping the law on the books, he says, makes “a mockery of what the rule of law is supposed to be”.
相反,这一判决使事态变得更加混乱。他说,将法律停留在书面层是“对法治的嘲弄”。

(恭喜读完,本篇英语词汇量454左右)
原文出自:2022年3月5日《经济学人》Asia版块
精读笔记来源于:自由英语之路
本文翻译整理:Irene
本文编辑校对: Irene
仅供个人英语学习交流使用。


【补充资料】(来源于网络)

在英国殖民时期遗留下来的新加坡《刑法》第377A条规定:

无论公开或非公开的男男性行为,触碰男同性恋者的生殖器都被认为是“严重猥亵”(gross indecency),即算违法,最高可处以两年有期徒刑。


极化:电路上是有电流的,电容器的两个板就像两个电极,当极化好了,其反电势和电源电势相等,电路就不再有电流了。


【重点句子】
(3个)

It was necessary to strike a balance between accepting gay men and respecting society’s “traditional” mores.
有必要在接受男同性恋和尊重社会“传统”习俗之间取得平衡。

This is really a live-and-let-live approach.Yet it has satisfied no one.
这真是一种和平共处的方法。然而,这并没有让任何人满意。

The judgment has instead muddied the waters.
相反,这一判决使事态变得更加混乱。

《经济学人》双语:新加坡同性恋法律?

自由英语之路

上一篇新闻

超过140万新币奖学金!从今年开始,新加坡大学法学院资助汇总

下一篇新闻

想申请吗?奥克兰理工大学法学专业汇总

评论

订阅每日新闻

订阅每日新闻以免错过最新最热门的新加坡新闻。