X

恶补新加坡公立中小学到底有哪些类型剩余学籍难进的学校排名

有不少家长想让孩子早早到新加坡留学,但苦于对新加坡的教育体系不熟悉,不知道给孩子选择怎样的学校,今天小编就帮大家解决这个烦恼。

公立学校

Public schools

」公立学校是新加坡政府资助、由教育部管辖的学校。

小学分类:名校(一般有GEP课程)邻里小学

名校:设有GEP天才班的九所小学,基本上就是教育部官方认证的,毫无疑问的“名校”了。

GEP课程是教育部专家特地为超常儿童量身定制的高才教育计划。GEP班是教育部直接管理的,教师,教材,设备,考试等都是教育部特别安排的,不会和学校现有资源混在一起。

△ 开设GEP天才班的九所小学

邻里学校:因为它们一般在邻里区,俗称邻里学校,有不少邻里学校的学额也比较紧张的,申请难度也会不小。

中学● 政府学校

(government school)

学校开销由教育部直接负责,教师由教育部分配,课程需要完全跟着教育部的方案。

政府学校由教育部直接管理,由校长代为执行俗称邻里学校,新加坡绝大部分学校是政府学校(学校名字里一般带地名)。

●政府资助学校

(government-aided school)

管理方面和政府学校差不多。但是拨款较多,于学生受益。

●自治学校

(autonomous school)

拨款数额大,学校有权力聘老师,但也必须接受教育部的教师分配。内部管理由校长负责,基本上就是教育部出钱,信任校长管。

●自主学校

(independent school)

这些都是新加坡顶尖的学校,如齐名的华中与莱佛士,都属于自主学校。能进自主学校的学生,学习奋斗已经完成了一半,世界顶尖大学已在眼前。

内部管理全权交予校长,校长有很大的自主招生权力,教师全由学校自行聘任。拨款最大,学校另外收学费,教学质量和对学生的栽培是最好的。

以上都属于公立学校,都在新加坡教育部的管辖内!信誉、教学等都都有保障。

下面列出了2018年新加坡所有184所小学的排名。这个排名是根据2B阶段(包括第二阶段)所占用的位数来确定的,这也代表着各个学校的受欢迎程度!

在括号中是%余额空缺,余额空缺和总空缺的数字。在2B阶段余额越多,孩子可能得到的机会越多!!

1.Nanyang Primary School – 370 (5.1%, 20/390)

2.Tao Nan School – 318 (11.7%, 42/360)

3.Ai Tong School – 310 (6.1%, 20/330)

4. Maha Bodhi School – 300 (9.1%, 30/330)

5.Rosyth School – 280 (6.7%, 20/300)

6.Pei Chun Public School – 280 (6.7%, 20/300)

7.Henry Park Primary School – 278 (7.3%, 22/300)

8.Chongfu School – 264 (12.0%, 36/300)

9.Mee Toh School – 261 (27.5%, 99/360)

10.St. Hilda’s Primary School – 250 (7.4%, 20/270)

11.South View Primary School – 250 (7.4%, 20/270)

12.Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary School – 249 (7.8%, 21/270)

13.Nan Chiau Primary School – 248 (17.3%, 52/300)

14.Kong Hwa School – 246 (8.9%, 24/270)

15.Holy Innocents’ Primary School – 242 (10.4%, 28/270)

16.Rulang Primary School – 242 (10.4%, 28/270)

17.Fairfield Methodist School (Primary) – 237 (12.2%, 33/270)

18.Anglo-Chinese School (Junior) – 229 (15.2%, 41/270)

19.Maris Stella High School – 228 (15.6%, 42/270)

20.Catholic High School – 219 (8.8%, 21/240)

21.Sengkang Green Primary School – 217 (19.6%, 53/270)

22.Frontier Primary School – 216 (10.0%, 24/240)

23.Red Swastika School – 214 (10.8%, 26/240)

24.Northland Primary School – 210 (12.5%, 30/240)

25.Nan Hua Primary School – 210 (12.5%, 30/240)

26.Anglo-Chinese School (Primary) – 208 (13.3%, 32/240)

27.Temasek Primary School – 206 (14.2%, 34/240)

28.Punggol Green Primary School – 206 (35.6%, 114/320)

29.Paya Lebar Methodist Girls’ School (Primary) – 202 (25.2%, 68/270)

30.Kuo Chuan Presbyterian Primary School – 201 (16.3%, 39/240)

31.St. Andrew’s Junior School – 190 (20.8%, 50/240)

32.CHIJ St. Nicholas Girls’ School – 189 (10.0%, 21/210)

33.St. Joseph’s Institution Junior – 189 (21.3%, 51/240)

34.Radin Mas Primary School – 187 (11.0%, 23/210)

35.Anderson Primary School – 185 (11.9%, 25/210)

36.Gongshang Primary School – 185 (11.9%, 25/210)

37.Hong Wen School – 183 (12.9%, 27/210)

38.Poi Ching School – 182 (24.2%, 58/240)

39.Methodist Girls’ School (Primary) – 180 (14.3%, 30/210)

40.Westwood Primary School – 180 (25.0%, 60/240)

41.River Valley Primary School – 176 (26.7%, 64/240)

42.Bukit Panjang Primary School – 170 (29.2%, 70/240)

43.Ngee Ann Primary School – 169 (29.6%, 71/240)

44.Rivervale Primary School – 168 (30.0%, 72/240)

45.Canberra Primary School – 167 (20.5%, 43/210)

46.Singapore Chinese Girls’ Primary School – 166 (17.0%, 34/200)

47.Punggol View Primary School – 166 (48.1%, 154/320)

48.Admiralty Primary School – 164 (21.9%, 46/210)

49.Chij Primary (Toa Payoh) – 163 (22.4%, 47/210)

50.Jurong Primary School – 160 (23.8%, 50/210)

51.Qifa Primary School – 158 (34.2%, 82/240)

52.Raffles Girls’ Primary School – 156 (42.2%, 114/270)

53.West Spring Primary School – 155 (35.4%, 85/240)

54.Springdale Primary School – 155 (42.6%, 115/270)

55.Xinmin Primary School – 154 (26.7%, 56/210)

56.Yu Neng Primary School – 151 (16.1%, 29/180)

57.Shuqun Primary School – 150 (37.5%, 90/240)

58.Yangzheng Primary School – 149 (17.2%, 31/180)

59.Keming Primary School – 148 (29.5%, 62/210)

60.Chij Our Lady Of The Nativity – 148 (38.3%, 92/240)

61.St. Anthony’s Primary School – 147 (30.0%, 63/210)

62.Woodlands Primary School – 147 (30.0%, 63/210)

63.Compassvale Primary School – 147 (38.8%, 93/240)

64.De La Salle School – 147 (45.6%, 123/270)

65.Riverside Primary School – 145 (31.0%, 65/210)

66.Princess Elizabeth Primary School – 144 (31.4%, 66/210)

67.Hougang Primary School – 142 (32.4%, 68/210)

68.Concord Primary School – 141 (41.3%, 99/240)

69.Junyuan Primary School – 140 (22.2%, 40/180)

70.Pasir Ris Primary School – 139 (22.8%, 41/180)

71.Horizon Primary School – 139 (56.6%, 181/320)

72.Clementi Primary School – 137 (42.9%, 103/240)

73.Chongzheng Primary School – 136 (24.4%, 44/180)

74.Lakeside Primary School – 136 (35.2%, 74/210)

75.Geylang Methodist School (Primary) – 136 (49.6%, 134/270)

76.Palm View Primary School – 135 (50.0%, 135/270)

77.White Sands Primary School – 133 (26.1%, 47/180)

78.West Grove Primary School – 132 (37.1%, 78/210)

79.Woodgrove Primary School – 130 (38.1%, 80/210)

80.Teck Ghee Primary School – 126 (40.0%, 84/210)

81.Jiemin Primary School – 125 (40.5%, 85/210)

82.Kheng Cheng School – 124 (48.3%, 116/240)

83.Chij (Katong) Primary – 123 (41.4%, 87/210)

84.Greenridge Primary School – 122 (49.2%, 118/240)

85.Jurong West Primary School – 118 (43.8%, 92/210)

86.Evergreen Primary School – 118 (43.8%, 92/210)

87.Zhenghua Primary School – 118 (50.8%, 122/240)

88.St. Stephen’s School – 116 (44.8%, 94/210)

89.North Vista Primary School – 114 (57.8%, 156/270)

90.St. Margaret’s Primary School – 112 (44.0%, 88/200)

91.Zhangde Primary School – 112 (46.7%, 98/210)

92.Xingnan Primary School – 108 (40.0%, 72/180)

93.Chij (Kellock) – 108 (46.0%, 92/200)

94.Chua Chu Kang Primary School – 108 (48.6%, 102/210)

95.Fengshan Primary School – 108 (48.6%, 102/210)

96.Naval Base Primary School – 108 (55.0%, 132/240)

97.Edgefield Primary School – 108 (61.4%, 172/280)

98.Innova Primary School – 104 (50.5%, 106/210)

99.Tampines Primary School – 104 (50.5%, 106/210)

100.Anchor Green Primary School – 104(61.5%, 166/270)

101.Unity Primary School – 103 (51.0%,107/210)

102.Endeavour Primary School – 101(57.9%, 139/240)

103.Fuhua Primary School – 101 (57.9%,139/240)

104.Casuarina Primary School – 100(44.4%, 80/180)

105.Punggol Primary School – 100 (52.4%,110/210)

106.Greenwood Primary School – 100(58.3%, 140/240)

107.Jing Shan Primary School – 99 (34.0%,51/150)

108.North View Primary School – 98(45.6%, 82/180)

109.Alexandra Primary School – 97 (53.8%,113/210)

110.Queenstown Primary School – 97(59.6%, 143/240)

111.Woodlands Ring Primary School – 97(59.6%, 143/240)

112.Fernvale Primary School – 97 (64.1%,173/270)

113.Punggol Cove Primary School – 97(69.7%, 223/320)

114.Fuchun Primary School – 96 (54.3%, 114/210)

115.Tanjong Katong Primary School – 96(60.0%, 144/240)

116.Opera Estate Primary School – 94(47.8%, 86/180)

117.Huamin Primary School – 91 (56.7%,119/210)

118.Haig Girls’ School – 89 (50.6%,91/180)

119.Elias Park Primary School – 88(51.1%, 92/180)

120.Beacon Primary School – 86 (64.2%,154/240)

121.Yishun Primary School – 85 (59.5%,125/210)

122.Greendale Primary School – 83 (74.1%,237/320)

123.Oasis Primary School – 83 (74.1%,237/320)

124.Marymount Convent School – 82 (61.0%,128/210)

125.Corporation Primary School – 82 (65.8%,158/240)

126.Yew Tee Primary School – 81 (61.4%,129/210)

127.Bendemeer Primary School – 81 (61.4%,129/210)

128.Seng Kang Primary School – 81 (70.0%,189/270)

129.Gan Eng Seng Primary School – 80(55.6%, 100/180)

130.Sembawang Primary School – 79 (62.4%,131/210)

131.Bedok Green Primary School – 79(67.1%, 161/240)

132.Wellington Primary School – 78(67.5%, 162/240)

133.Waterway Primary School – 78 (75.6%,242/320)

134.East Spring Primary School – 77(57.2%, 103/180)

135.St. Anthony’s Canossian PrimarySchool – 77 (67.9%, 163/240)

136.Pei Tong Primary School – 76 (68.3%,164/240)

137.Xishan Primary School – 76 (68.3%,164/240)

138.Telok Kurau Primary School – 75(68.8%, 165/240)

139.Qihua Primary School – 74 (69.2%,166/240)

140.Yumin Primary School – 73 (51.3%,77/150)

141.Peiying Primary School – 70 (66.7%,140/210)

142.Chij Our Lady Queen Of Peace – 69(61.7%, 111/180)

143.Cantonment Primary School – 69(67.1%, 141/210)

144.Chij Our Lady Of Good Counsel – 68(54.7%, 82/150)

145.Si Ling Primary School – 68 (67.6%,142/210)

146.Boon Lay Garden Primary School – 68(71.7%, 172/240)

147.St. Gabriel’s Primary School – 67(55.3%, 83/150)

148.North Spring Primary School – 67(75.2%, 203/270)

149.Pioneer Primary School – 66 (63.3%,114/180)

150.Changkat Primary School – 65 (63.9%,115/180)

151.Northoaks Primary School – 65 (72.9%,175/240)

152.New Town Primary School – 64 (73.3%,176/240)

153.Ahmad Ibrahim Primary School – 63(70.0%, 147/210)

154.Tampines North Primary School – 63(70.0%, 147/210)

155.Bukit View Primary School – 61(71.0%, 149/210)

156.Cedar Primary School – 59 (67.2%,121/180)

157.Mayflower Primary School – 59 (67.2%,121/180)

158.Dazhong Primary School – 57 (72.9%,153/210)

159.Xinghua Primary School – 57 (76.3%,183/240)

160.Yuhua Primary School – 55 (73.8%,155/210)

161.Lianhua Primary School – 54 (74.3%,156/210)

162.Ang Mo Kio Primary School – 52(71.1%, 128/180)

163.Townsville Primary School – 52(75.2%, 158/210)

164.Teck Whye Primary School – 51 (71.7%,129/180)

165.Park View Primary School – 49 (72.8%,131/180)

166.Marsiling Primary School – 49 (79.6%,191/240)

167.Meridian Primary School – 47 (73.9%,133/180)

168.Bukit Timah Primary School – 46(78.1%, 164/210)

169.Eunos Primary School – 45 (70.0%,105/150)

170.Damai Primary School – 45 (78.6%,165/210)

171.Yio Chu Kang Primary School – 42(80.0%, 168/210)

172.Farrer Park Primary School – 40(77.8%, 140/180)

173.Montfort Junior School – 39 (67.5%,81/120)

174.Canossa Catholic Primary School – 39(67.5%, 81/120)

175.West View Primary School – 39 (81.4%,171/210)

176.Kranji Primary School – 37 (75.3%,113/150)

177.Zhonghua Primary School – 37 (79.4%,143/180)

178.Angsana Primary School – 35 (83.3%,175/210)

179.Blangah Rise Primary School – 28(76.7%, 92/120)

180.Stamford Primary School – 28 (84.4%,152/180)

181.Guangyang Primary School – 25 (83.3%,125/150)

182.Fern Green Primary School – 24(92.0%, 276/300)

183.First Toa Payoh Primary School – 23(84.7%, 127/150)

184.Juying Primary School – 19 (89.4%,161/180)

[小学申请]

新加坡最难进的十所小学

(*在上方列表中已经标出)

NO.10 Rosyth Primary School.

学校靠近宏茂桥一带。这个学校在2B和2C阶段就需要抽签了。

你以为你给学校做义工,就很厉害了嘛?

你以为你是基层领袖,就很厉害了嘛?

你们统统来参加抽签吧,义工太多了,基层领袖也太多了,家长付出这么多的时间和精力,也只能换来一个抽签机会啦。

NO.9

Rulang Primary School, 孺廊小学

学校在Jurong West, 与第10名的学校一样,在2B和2C的阶段就需要抽签。

虽然在学校义工和基层领袖阶段,抽签没有这么惨烈,但是在2C阶段的竞争是非常激烈的。

NO.8

Nan Chiau Primary 南侨小学

历史悠久的小学,属于福建会馆,位于新加坡的东北地区,靠近万国地铁站。

同样的,在2B和2C阶段都需要抽签,尤其在学校义工和基层领袖这个环节上,都要比之前提到的两个学校激烈。

NO.7

Tao Nan Primary School, 道南小学

这个也是非常出名的学校了,在东海岸地区一支独秀,同样属于福建会馆。

2015年的2C阶段,道南的申请率为203%,基本上是2个里面中一个。

NO.6

Red Swastika

好了,现在进入2A(2)阵营,觉得之前几个学校竞争很激烈嘛?后面提到的更惨!

这个学校的位置在勿洛北,在当地是非常出名的学校。

从现在开始提到的学校,从2A(2)就开始抽签了,这个阶段,申请人的父母或者兄弟姐妹曾经是这个学校的校友,或者父母是该学校的工作人员。从这个阶段开始,就已经不可以保证入学了,而且后面每个阶段都是一路的抽签,如果运气不好的话,很有可能最后拿不到学额。

NO.5

Catholic High Primary School 公教小学

学校位置:靠近壁山

同样的,在2A(2)开始,一路抽签。公教家族的学校,一直都是趋之若鹜。在2015年的2A(2)阶段,32个申请人竞逐30个学额,申请成功的比率还是很大的,但是总还是会有2个申请人败兴而归。

NO.4

Henry Park Primary

学校位置在荷兰路,靠近 Dover MRT 的位置。

2015年的2A(2)阶段,着实火了一把,42个申请人抢23个学额。成为去年最夺人眼球的学校。

NO.3

Ai Tong 爱同小学

学校位置:壁山一带

最惊人的传说,就是在2013年的时候,2C申请率居然高达543%,就是说5个人里面才能抽中一个。

基本上有点买彩票中大奖的赶脚了。在2015年的2A(2)阶段里,49个申请人竞争36个学额。虽然没有 Henry Park 抢眼,但是它2B阶段确是相当的怕人。

NO.2

Nan Hua Primary 南华小学

学校位置:金文泰

2A(2)阶段,43人抢37席。南华最惨的竞争在2C阶段。

NO.1

CHIJ St Nicholas Girls’ 圣尼各拉女校

学校位置:宏茂桥

来到第一名了,这第一名已经超越2A(2)家族,因为这间学校是唯一一间,在2A(1)就要抽签的学校了。

在2A(1)阶段,学生的家长,需要是学校的校友委员会成员,或是校方管理委员会成员,或是校方顾问。拼爹到如此地步,你还要抽签,就算你是学校的校长,还有可能自己的孩子没有办法来学校读书。

国际生想要进入公立中小学,必须参加AEIS考试,通过了考试后随机分配学校。所以国际生想要读公立学校就要抓紧时间提升AEIS成绩啦

以上就是今天的全部介绍啦,如果您对新加坡留学感兴趣,或者在择校和专业方面有任何疑问,欢迎咨询意腾留www.eistudy.com或者关注官微《新加坡留学么》