新加坡是东南亚最发达的国家（人均gdp为55000美元，比大部分欧洲国家还要高），最接近新加坡的东南亚国家是文莱（人均gdp为40000美元），泰国远远落后，人均只有6000美元，泰国比老挝或柬埔寨更加发达，但远远落后新加坡或文莱.......
外国网友评论：
Mohd Haffiez Mohmad Nazri
Follow
Business Development Manager at Foodpanda (2019–present)5y
Human Development Index
Singapore
Brunei
Malaysia
Thailand
按照人类发展指数排名
新加坡
文莱
马来西亚
泰国
Mickey Lin
Follow Thai-speaker who spent time in Bangkok & Chiangmai6y
Singapore is the most developed (GDP per capita of $55,000 USD, higher than most European countries).
Second closest would be Brunei (GDP per capita of $40,000 USD).
Thailand is a distant $6,000 USD GDP per capita
Thailand is more developed than Laos or Cambodia, but nowhere near Singapore or Brunei.
新加坡是东南亚最发达的国家（人均gdp为55000美元，比大部分欧洲国家还要高）
最接近新加坡的东南亚国家是文莱（人均gdp为40000美元）
泰国远远落后，人均只有6000美元
泰国比老挝或柬埔寨更加发达，但远远落后新加坡或文莱
Adri Febrianto
To me , Malaysia is the second most developed nation in Southeast Asia. Malaysia has better mass transportation system, internet technology, skyscrapers, etc. than Brunei Darussalam. Thanks to its abundant oil and gas resources, Brunei managed to rank second in terms of highest GDP per capita in the region. But, due to its low number of population (around 400,000 only), economic growth rate has been going very slow. Surely, Brunei is a wealthy country, and the benevolent Sultan managed the money very well for his people.
对我来说，马来西亚才是东南亚第二发达的国家。马来西亚的公共交通系统，互联网技术和摩天大楼等都要比文莱好。多亏了丰富的油气资源，文莱才能在东南亚人均gdp上排名第二。但由于文莱人口数量很少(大约只有40万人)，其经济发展速度一直非常缓慢。当然文莱是一个富裕的国家，仁慈的苏丹为人民妥善的管理着他们的财富。
Krasin Pongtornpipat
Rather than being more developed, Brunei just has higher GDP per capita than Thailand. Other than that, Thailand is a more developed country in almost every aspect. She has much more advanced education system, infrastructure, agriculture, manufacturing and technology. Being better with GDP per capita does not mean being more developed.
In Southeast Asia, Thailand has the second largest GDP after Indonesia and lags behind only Singapore and Malaysia in terms of development.
文莱并没有比泰国更加发达，文莱只是人均gdp更高而已。抛开人均gdp这个因素，泰国在各个方面都要比文莱更加发达。泰国有着更加先进的教育系统，基础设施，农业，制造业和技术。人均gdp更高并不意味着更加发达
在东南亚，泰国是仅次于印尼的gdp第二大国，在发展程度上仅落后于马来西亚和新加坡
Richard Otier
But Thailand might be No. 1 as having the most political uncertainty, now in its 20th junta since 1932.
但泰国或许是政治最不稳定的国家，自1932年以来泰国已经出现了20个军政府
Ariel Juego Littaua
Thailand GDP per capita is awfully far from Singapore and it will never like Singapore especially from now it's economy isn't growing. I could say Thailand is in the level of Malaysia, Indonesia and Philippines.
泰国的人均gdp距离新加坡还很遥远，泰国永远无法像新加坡那样，尤其是现在泰国经济已经处于停滞状态。我认为泰国的水平和马来西亚印尼菲律宾相当。
Natt Srinara
Follow Marketing at ESSEC Business School (2019–present)4y
Being Singaporean as well as originally Thai, I’d like to chime in just a little. There is no doubt about Singapore’s climb to its current economic heights that’s left the rest of SE Asia, and in fact the whole of Asia far behind (on a per capita basis). It is very rich indeed. However, I’d also like to stress that this wealth is highly dependent on the current stability of global currencies, as well as the free flow of trade and services. Singapore remains 100% dependent on global and regional trade, even in basic necessities.
我本来是泰国人，现在是新加坡人，所以我想在这里插几句话。毫无疑问，目前新加坡经济发展的高度已经将其余东南亚国家，实际上还有整个亚洲都远远甩在了身后（就人均而言）。新加坡确实非常富裕。但我想要强调一点，那就是新加坡的富裕高度当前国际货币的稳定性，和贸易和服务的自由流动性。新加坡要100%依赖全球和地区贸易，甚至连基本的生活必需品也要依赖外部。
So while its fair to say that economic development is Singapore’s key strength, the fact that it does not have a self-sustaining domestic economy, no natural resources and is heavily dependent on foreign labour. Despite its political turmoil, Thailand remains a strong, growing internal economy, a powerful military, plenty of cheap yet skilled labour, a growing middle-class, plenty of land, mineral and agricultural resources, booming tourism and never been colonized by a colonial power (did I also mention the food is really good?). So if ‘development’ was to be defined broadly, encompassing both economic, strategic and cultural factors, its arguable that Thailand, holistically, is in a better position to sustain itself over the next 1 to 2 centuries and develop itself into a major power in SE Asia.
平心而论，经济发展是新加坡的主要优势，但事实上新加坡没有一个可以自给自足的国内经济，没有自然资源，要高度依赖外国劳动力。尽管泰国政治混乱，但泰国有一个强大的不断发展的国内经济，泰国还有强大的军队，大量廉价但熟练的劳动力，还有不断增多的中产阶级，大量的土地，矿产和农业资源，还有蓬勃发展的旅游业，而且泰国从来没有被殖民列强殖民过。所以如果给发展一个更加广泛的定义的话，将经济，战略，文化等因素都包含进来，那么可以说从整体上看泰国更有能力在未来1到2个世纪维持自己的发展，成为东南亚一个主要强国。
Warren Wai
FollowI love Thailand, who doesn't ?!
Singapore is already developed. It is arguably one of the richest and most well developed nations on earth.
Brunei has a high GDP but in terms of infrastructure, organisation and governance, it is no better than Malaysia. Both countries would be appear less favourable in most indices of development when compared with Western Europe, North America and Japan. Still they seems to do better than Thailand, albeit only slightly so.
新加坡已经是一个发达国家，可以说是世界上最富裕，最发达的国家之一
文莱人均gdp很高，但在基础设施，组织和治理方面，文莱并不比马来西亚好。和西欧，北美和日本相比，这两个国家在大部分发展指标上并不怎么样。但依然要好于泰国，但也只比泰国好一点点。
Thailand has the next highest per capital GDP on the list. The status of its infrastructure, level of governance and the economic development are progressing well and will soon be in par with Eastern Europe. However, this is only true for Bangkok metropolitan area, which is the focus of the population and its wealth. Rest of rural Thailand remains poor and underdeveloped. Therefore, no, Thailand is not the MOST developed.
泰国的人均gdp仅次于新加坡和文莱。它的基础设施的状况，治理水平和经济发展都取得了巨大的进步，不久将达到东欧国家的水平。但这仅适用于曼谷大都市区，这里是泰国人口和财富的集中地。泰国其他地区依然贫穷不发达。因此，不，泰国不是东南亚最发达的国家。
Indonesia and Vietnam is still underdeveloped but are seeing progress. Both Jakarta and Ho Chi Minh City have new infrastructure coming up like Metro and new airport terminals. They however will not reach developed status for a while.
Philippines has to improve its infrastructure, compared to rest of SE Asia (e.g. the airport in Manila is still horrible compared to other SE Asia capital’s even Yangon’s and the public transport system is still unbelievably chaotic). However, with an improving economy, Philippines might catch up with Indonesia and Vietnam very quickly. All 3 nations will probably reach Thailand’s level within 10 years.
Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar remain utterly underdeveloped and with no sight of great advancement in the next few decades.
印尼和越南依旧不发达，但正在取得进步。雅加达和胡志明市出现了新的基础设施，比如地铁和新的机场航站楼。但是他们未来还暂时达不到发达国家的程度。
和东南亚其他国家相比，菲律宾必须要改善自己的基础设施（和东南亚其他国家的首都机场相比，马尼拉机场状况依然非常糟糕，甚至连缅甸的仰光都不如，菲律宾公共交通系统依然一片混乱）。但随着经济的不断改善，菲律宾或许可以很快追上印尼和越南。这三个国家或许可以在十年内追上泰国。
老挝柬埔寨和缅甸依然还是完全不发达国家，在未来几十年看不到有巨大的进步的可能性。
Hakim
I agree with most of what you have to share but I'd add that Malaysia is a much more developed nation compared to Thailand, only Bangkok is developed buy the rural parts are not and where else for Malaysia, it has more developed urban cities besides Kuala Lumpur.
我同意你写的大部分内容，但我想补充一点，那就是马来西亚是一个比泰国更加发达的国家，泰国只有曼谷是发达的，但农村却不是，而马来西亚除了吉隆坡之外，在其他地方还有更加发达的都市。
龙腾网 转载